Robin Hood Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1

Robin Hood - Case Study Example iff as well as the paranoiac nature of Prince John which can harm the campaign if he acts in an irrational manner and the Barons may end up undermining the efforts that Robin has already made. Ans2. The best option may seem to be to take the life of the Sherrif, but this option has more downsides as compared to any other option. The best option available to Robin is to join hands with the Barons. This will help in solving several issues that are being faced by the campaign. This would result in increase in the size of the fighters; the Barons would bring in capital which will satisfy the need for more resources. King Richard would be freed as the financial resources collected by the Barons will be used to pay the ransom amount and by this strategy, the sheriff will be eradicated as the sheriff will lose power and King Richard will be able to satisfy the needs of the peasants. Ans3. In order to implement the strategy of joining hands with Barons, first Robin Hood needs to contact the Barons and inform them about his strategy. Next he needs to inform his own band members regarding the merger and inform them about the benefits to the band of this endeavor (Hitt 92). Joining hands with Baron would result in increase in the band members, so Robin Hood will need to assign different roles to different band members and more managers need to be instated to manage the band in an effective manner. Next, Robin Hood will need to train the band members in conducting agriculture work which will help the band in raising financial resources to support the group. Lastly execute the plan of collecting the ransom and freeing the

The influence of German Philosophy and English Political Economy in Essay

The influence of German Philosophy and English Political Economy in Marx's Economic and Philosphical Manuscripts (1844) - Essay Example His major contribution in the field of philosophy was based on the integration and unity of mind/spirit among phenomenon which were manifested in a set of contradictions without elimination of the other. For example, bondage and freedom were not directly related in perception and application but they were philosophically integrated and united in the process of development (Spirkin, 1983). The Marxian dialectical materialism approach had been influenced by Hegel’s work in that economic history was understood by viewing human societies as components of a hierarchy of systems processing energy and continuously evolving. This was according to the laws of nature and encompassed multifarious forms of being that existed objectively and independently (Zarembka and Desai, 2011). Karl Marx in his view believed that dialects should not deal on the mental ideas of the world but on material world such as prospects of economic history that was based on production and other economic activiti es. This would necessitate empirical understanding of social processes in the form of interrelations, development and transformations; with successful generations transforming the results of the generations that preceded them (Zarembka and Desai, 2011), and thus divine presence and contradiction between immanence and transcendence. Ludwig Feuerbach was a German philosopher and anthropologist who provided a critique of Christianity and his thoughts were usually viewed as a bridge between Hegel and Karl Marx. By defining the â€Å"false† or theological essence of religion which regarded God as having a separate existence over and against humankind and the belief in sacraments as the â€Å"last supper† symbolizing the religious piece of materialism and thus injuring moral sense and the sense of truth (Feuerbach, 1972). When applying the dialectical methods of analyzing the economic history, economic, socio-cultural or political phenomenon; they should not be viewed separa tely but on their inner connections as an integrated totality and structured around the basic predominant mode of production (Feuerbach, 1972). According to Marx, economic history can be analyzed by understanding the organization of people and their technological powers. For instance, how they model them to interact with their material surroundings, giving the historical structure and development process of modern day capitalistic economies. With this, Marx views society in form of money and alienated man such that in the modern capitalistic societies man is evaluated in terms of their materialistic creditability; influencing their economic judgment of his morality and creating gaps between capitalists and laborers, a correlation of Friedrich’s integration and unity of opposing phenomenon and view on power and submission (Marx and Engels, 2009). Marxian economics evaluates various crunches in capitalism and focuses on the dissemination of resources in terms of surplus product and value generated within the production process among various types of economic systems. The investigation of the nature and origin of economic value, the economic evolution and the analysis of impacts of class and struggles of these classes along the economic and political processes, gives the approach a viable analytical framework an alternative approach to neoclassical economics thus making it unique. As a